Skip to content

AI Citation Checker for Academic Writing

Claim Confidence verifies every citation in your draft against the source it points to. Catch hallucinated references, unsupported claims, and contradicted citations before reviewers do.

Loved by over 6 million academics
Maximum Deadlift Capacity of Elite Sprinters R…

Maximum Deadlift Capacity of Elite Sprinters R…

Abstract

This investigation quantifies elite sprinters' maximal deadlift capacity, showing that elite cohorts lift up to three times their body weight and underscoring the role of lower-body strength in sprint performance (Schiemann et al., 2024). This association holds across athletic populations, substantiating its contribution to explosive power (Conan & DeBeliso, 2020). Maximal lower-extremity strength enhances jumping and sprint performance in team sports (Warneke et al., 2022).

Trusted by Universities and businesses across the world

GooglePennUniversity of CambridgeUniversityAston University

How it works

From draft to verified citations in three steps

01

Drop in your draft

Paste a section, upload your .docx, or work directly in Jenni's editor. Claim Confidence reads each in-text citation and finds the source it points to.

02

Run the review

Jenni cross-references each citation against its source — verifying claims against your library plus CrossRef, PubMed, and OpenAlex. Verdicts in under a minute.

03

Edit and re-verify

Each flagged claim shows you the exact passage from the source and a suggested rewrite. Accept, edit, or dismiss, then re-run the review to confirm the fix.

Six ways your citations can fail — and how Jenni catches them

Claim Confidence verifies every cited claim against its source and sorts issues into six categories — so you know exactly what kind of fix is needed.

Misrepresented

The claim distorts what the cited source actually says.

EXAMPLE

"Smith (2022) demonstrated that GPT-4 outperforms human teachers" — when Smith only measured grading speed, not teaching quality.

Contradicted

The cited source argues the opposite of the claim.

EXAMPLE

"Continuous fasting accelerates cellular repair (Lin et al., 2023)" — but Lin's findings show repair plateaus after 72 hours.

Unsupported

The cited source doesn't address the claim at all.

EXAMPLE

"CRISPR-Cas9 has been ethically endorsed by the WHO (Doudna, 2020)" — Doudna discusses mechanism, not WHO policy.

Weakly supported

Evidence in the source is thin or limited in scope.

EXAMPLE

"Resistance training improves cognition across populations (Conan, 2020)" — Conan studied only collegiate athletes.

Overstated

The claim goes further than the source warrants.

EXAMPLE

"LLM tutors significantly improve student outcomes (Park, 2024)" — Park reports a small effect on one task.

Unverifiable

The cited source can't be located or accessed.

EXAMPLE

"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI doesn't resolve, and no record exists in any indexed database.

See Claim Confidence in action

Watch Jenni's AI citation checker verify a real draft, flag weak and unsupported claims, and surface the source passages — in just over a minute.

WHY IT WORKS

Built for substance, not just metadata

Other AI citation tools either fabricate references or just format them. Claim Confidence verifies every claim against the source it cites.

Reads the full source

Other AI citation checkers verify metadata — does the paper exist, is the DOI valid, is the author real. Claim Confidence reads the full text of every cited source, so verdicts come from what the paper actually says.

Six verdicts, not pass/fail

A binary "verified" stamp doesn't tell you how to fix a problem. Six categories pinpoint exactly what kind of edit each claim needs.

Suggested rewrites grounded in the source

When a claim falls short, Claim Confidence surfaces the actual passage from the cited source and proposes a rewrite that fits what the source supports.

Part of Reviews

Your full pre-submission citation review

Peer Review is one of four Review tools that catch issues before reviewers do. Run them together for a complete pre-submission pass.

Peer review

8 / 10

Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.

Soundness

3/4

Presentation

4/4

Contribution

3/4

Results

Strengths

Weaknesses

Claim confidence

7 issues

Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.

Supported

23

Misrepresented

Contradicted

1

Unsupported

3

Weakly supported

2

Overstated

Unverifiable

1

Proofread

18 edits

Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.

Word choice

All

The majority of

Formality

which was interesting.

.

Grammar

be effective.

appears to be effective.

Transitions

Also,

In addition,

Overgeneralized

All

The majority of

The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.

Tone of voice

22 notes

Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.

All Suggestions

22

Vocabulary

6

Syntax

5

Punctuation

4

Tone

3

Flow

4

Peer Review

Claim Confidence

Proofread

Tone of Voice

"The Claim Confidence feature is super useful. It flags any unsupported, overstated, or weakly supported claims."

Sabine Hossenfelder

Physicist & Author of Lost in Math

"I regularly try AI tools for research and have found Jenni the best and easiest to use. Especially for rapdily re-formatting references and developing new paper ideas."

Gareth

Editor-in-chief, Taylor & Francis

Frequently asked questions

How does the AI actually verify a claim — what's it comparing?

It compares each cited claim against the full text of the source it points to — not the abstract, not the metadata. Verdicts are sorted along four dimensions reviewers actually care about: whether the source supports the claim at all, the scope of the support (population, setting, timeframe), the strength of certainty (proves vs. suggests), and the accuracy of attribution. The exact source passage is shown alongside every verdict, so you can audit the reasoning rather than take it on faith.

Can it check non-English sources?

Yes, Jenni supports all languages.

Does it work with sources behind paywalls or in my institutional library?

Claim Confidence has access to your Jenni library uploads, 10M+ Open Access papers, and citations from major scholarly sites. For paywalled papers you can access through your institution, upload the PDF to your library and Claim Confidence will use it. For sources it can't access at all, the claim is marked Unverifiable so you know to check it manually.

What if a flagged claim is actually correct and the verdict is wrong - can I dismiss it?

Absolutely. Click Dismiss on any verdict and it's gone - no record of the disagreement is kept on your draft. You can also leave a note explaining the dismissal for your future self or collaborators. Claim Confidence is a second pair of eyes, not a gate.

What if a source I cited has been retracted or updated since I wrote my draft?

Claim Confidence checks against the version it can locate at the time of the review — usually what you want before submission. Significant version changes and retraction notices are surfaced alongside the verdict, so you find out before your reviewers do.

Will running a review change my draft automatically?

No. Claim Confidence is read-only on your draft. It surfaces verdicts and suggested rewrites, but every change is your decision — accept, edit, or dismiss. Your original stays intact until you choose to apply a fix.

What's the difference between "Weakly Supported," "Overstated," and "Misrepresented"?

Weakly Supported: the source supports your claim, but in a narrower context than your phrasing implies (e.g., one population, one method). Overstated: the source supports a softer version — the paper says "may contribute to" and you wrote "causes." Misrepresented: the source doesn't actually say what you've attributed to it — the gap is bigger than tone or scope. Each verdict comes with the exact source passage and a suggested rewrite, so the fix is usually a small edit rather than a re-search.

Make progress on your greatest work, today

Write your first paper with Jenni today and never look back

Start for free

No credit card required

Cancel anytime

Over 6m

Academics worldwide

5.2 hours saved

On average per paper

Over 15m

Papers written on Jenni