AI Writing Workspace built for Grant Writers
Upload funder guidelines, ask questions across your materials, and draft a clear proposal in one writing workspace.
Abstract
This investigation quantifies elite sprinters’ maximal deadlift capacity, showing that elite cohorts lift up to three times their body weight and underscoring the role of lower-body strength in sprint performance (Schiemann et al., 2024). This association holds across athletic populations, substantiating its contribution to explosive power (Conan & DeBeliso, 2020). Maximal lower-extremity strength also enhances jumping and sprint performance in team sports (Warneke et al., 2022). Building on this, heavy deadlifts in warm-up protocols acutely improve vertical jump and change-of-direction performance (Abade et al., 2023).
References
Abade, E., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Conte, D., & Pareja-Blanco, F. (2023). Effects of adding heavy loaded deadlifts to warm-up on acute vertical jump and change-of-direction performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(5), 1052–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004341
Conan, E., & DeBeliso, M. (2020). The relationship between the back squat and sprint performance in track athletes. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 8(1), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.12691/jshp-8-1-1
Schiemann, S., Keiner, M., Wirth, K., Lohmann, L. H., & Warneke, K. (2024). The relationship between maximum deadlift strength and sprint performance in elite athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 38(4), 721–733.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004712
Seitz, L. B., Reyes, A., Tran, T. T., de Villarreal, E. S., & Haff, G. G. (2014). Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(12), 1693–1702.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0227-1
Warneke, K., Lohmann, L. H., Keiner, M., & Wagner, C.-M. (2022). Influence of strength training modalities on sprint performance in trained athletes. Sports, 10(7), 107.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10070107
Trusted by Universities and businesses across the world
How it works
From funder brief to polished proposal, in one workspace
01
Upload your funder docs
Add the RFP, funder guidelines, your data and reports. Everything lives in Jenni's library right beside your proposal.
02
Ask across your sources
03
Draft from evidence
04
Trace every claim
05
Review before you submit
Step 01 — Upload your funder docs
Library
✓ Added
Zotero ↗
2026 Community Fund — funder guidelines…
North County Health Foundation
County health needs assessment 2025
County Health Office
Mobile clinics and preventive-care access…
Health Services Research, 2024
Community health worker programs: a review
Am. J. Public Health, 2023
Barriers to primary care in rural areas
J. Rural Health, 2022
POWERFUL FEATUREs
Research, draft, and revise without switching tools
AI CHAT
Work with your own materials
Ask questions across the current document, selected PDFs, library collections, or the web.
AI AUTOCOMPLETE
Keep the draft moving
Suggestions use document context, headings, Section Prompts, and cited sources.
AI EDITING
Review every proposed change
Paraphrase, simplify, strengthen, translate, or apply a custom instruction with a visible diff before acceptance.
Every edit remains yours to accept, retry, or discard.
built for grant writing
Keep the brief beside the draft
Jenni gives grant writers source context, section-level guidance, and editing control inside the document where the proposal is taking shape.
Source context
Keep your funder guidelines, data, and reports in the sidebar as you write, so the brief is always a glance away, not buried in another tab.
Section-level guidance
Guidance tailored to each proposal section (needs statement, project narrative, evaluation) so every part answers what the funder actually asks for.
Editing control
Every AI suggestion is yours to accept, refine, or reject. You keep full control of the voice and the argument, and you stay the author.
PRE-SUBMISSION REVIEW
Polish the proposal before it leaves your desk
Four review layers that catch what a funder would flag before you submit: Grant Review, Claim Confidence, Proofread, and Tone of Voice.
Grant review
8 / 10
Your proposal scored against a funder review rubric, with reviewer comments on each section.
Significance
3/4
Approach
4/4
Feasibility
3/4
Impact
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence
10 issues
Claim Confidence checks every claim against your uploaded sources, flagging what a funder or reviewer would question before you submit.
Misrepresented
Contradicted
1
Unsupported
4
Weakly supported
2
Overstated
2
Off-brief
1
Vague impact
1
Unverifiable
Outdated
Citation mismatch
1
Proofread
18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the proposal has areas to tighten before it reaches a reviewer.
Word choice
All
Most
Formality
which was pretty bad.
.
Grammar
be effective.
is likely to be effective.
Transitions
Also,
In addition,
Overstated
All
Many
The program will eliminatereduce barriers to care.
Tone of voice
22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent, funder-ready voice.
All Suggestions
22
Vocabulary
6
Syntax
5
Punctuation
4
Tone
3
Flow
4
Grant Review
Claim Confidence
Proofread
Tone of Voice
"The Claim Confidence feature is super useful. It flags any unsupported, overstated, or weakly supported claims."
Sabine Hossenfelder
Physicist & Author of Lost in Math
"I regularly try AI tools for research and have found Jenni the best and easiest to use. Especially for rapdily re-formatting references and developing new paper ideas."
Gareth
Editor-in-chief, Taylor & Francis
Frequently asked questions
Can I use Jenni’s citation tool for grant proposals?
Definitely. You can cite and format all references easily within your grant document using your synced reference manager library.
Can Jenni integrate with Zotero or Mendeley?
Yes, you can import citations via BibTeX from Zotero or Mendeley directly into your research library.
What risks should I watch for using AI in grants?
Avoid over-reliance, verify facts, edit for authenticity, and ensure the proposal aligns with funder expectations.
Does Jenni support collaboration on proposals?
You can export drafts and share editable documents, Jenni also keeps versions consistent with Citation Generator and formatting tools.
Is prompt engineering needed to use Jenni?
Not always, you can start with simple prompts, but clear context improves output quality for proposal writing.
Can I use Jenni’s chatbot to answer grant questions?
Yes, AskJenni (Chat Assistant) answers questions about structure, research framing, or writing strategies while you work.
How much time can Jenni save on grant writing?
On average, users report saving over 5 hours per proposal by using Jenni’s autocomplete, summarizer, and citation tools.
What formats can I export my proposal to?
Export in Word (.docx), LaTeX, or PDF formats, complete with formatted citations and reference lists.
Can I generate a grant outline with Jenni?
Use Jenni’s Outline & Thesis Generator to create logical frameworks with section headings and a clear narrative flow.
Is there support for non‑English proposals?
Yes, Jenni supports multilingual drafting and paraphrasing across 30+ languages while maintaining academic tone and clarity.
Make progress on your greatest work, today
Write your next proposal with Jenni today and never look back
Start for free
No credit card required
Cancel anytime
Over 6m
Academics worldwide
5.2 hours saved
On average per paper
Over 15m
Papers written on Jenni